Recently however Intel has been able to drive its per-core performance up with Sandy Bridge, where it's becoming increasingly difficult to recommend AMD alternatives with higher core counts. The heavily threaded desktop niche is tough to sell to, particularly when you force users to take a significant hit on single threaded performance in order to achieve value there. For a while now AMD has needed a brand new architecture, something that could lead to dominance in heavily threaded workloads while addressing its deficiencies in lightly threaded consumer workloads. After much waiting, we get that new architecture today. Bulldozer is here.
Read on for our full review!
]]>Artikel Terkait:
- Review: The Playstation Vita, Sony’s Portable Powerhouse
- Intel SSD 520 Review: Cherryville Brings Reliability to SandForce
- Review: Asus G74SX
- Review: HP dm4-3000ea Beats Edition
- Review: Disgo Tablet 7000
- Review: AMD Radeon HD 7950
- Review: Sapphire Radeon HD 7950 OverClock Edition
- Review: Nextivity Cel-Fi RS2 3G
- Review: X-Rite Colormunki Display
- Review: Gigabyte Aivia M8600
- Review: LaCie Little Big Disk Thunderbolt Series 240GB SSD
- Gadgets Week in Review: Picture Book
- Review: Iomega TV with Boxee
- Review: Samsung Series 8 S27A850D
- Review: Microsoft Security Essentials
- Review: BenQ EW2730V
- Review: ViewSonic VP2365-LED
- Review: Philips Brilliance 248C3LHSB
- Review: BenQ RL2240H
- Review: Motorola Xoom 2 Media Edition
- AMD Radeon HD 7970 Review: 28nm And Graphics Core Next, Together As One
- Review: Asus GTX 560 Ti 448 Core DirectCU II
- Review: Android 4.0: Ice Cream Sandwich
- Review: Updated: Apple TV
- Review: Sony Tablet P
- Kit Guru take Bulldozer to 4.8GHz on air using GIGABYTE 990FXA-UD7
- AMD’s Bulldozer Fails To Meet Expectations
- hicookie hits 8GHz on LN2 with AMD Bulldozer
- SinHardware does a video OC guide on the 990FXA-UD7 and Bulldozer, check it out!
- PCTuning use GIGABYTE boards for early Bulldozer and Gulftown head to head
0 comments:
Post a Comment